July 23, 2015
Aaron Warshaw
July 22, 2015
The First 100 Days of Ambush Elections: Impact on the Retail and Hospitality Sectors
July 22, 2015
New York Bill Follows California’s Lead to Recognize Professional Cheerleaders as Employees
July 22, 2015
Quest for “Living Wage” Results in Minimum Wage Increases in Kansas City, Missouri
July 22, 2015
California Governor Signs Paid Sick Leave Amendment—Effective Immediately
July 14, 2015
The Proposed Overtime Regulations: Are Your White Collar Employees Still Exempt?
June 30, 2015
FY 2016 H-1B Cap Lottery Selection Completed, Premium Processing Timeline Begins April 27, 2015
April 16, 2015
Supreme Court Rules Employer’s Motive (Not Knowledge) Decides Disparate-Treatment Claims
June 1, 2015
3/25/2015 12:00:00 AM
On March 25, 2015, the Supreme Court of the United States settled a controversy surrounding an employer’s policy that provided light-duty work for certain employees (including some disabled employees) but not for pregnant workers. The case was brought by a worker who tried to show—through indirect evidence—that the policy resulted in the disparate treatment of pregnant workers.